Q&A: Anti-pinkilessness

Our post of yesterday prompted a flurry of questions from supporters about the minutiae of the GNU Public Dictatorship's official position on anti-pinkilessness, so we thought we would take a moment to answer some of your questions.

Q. What constitutes "anti-pinkilessness?"
A. Anti-pinkilessness is discrimination against those without pinky fingers or without full pinky fingers. It generally takes the form of preventing them from mingling with the pinkied population, but can also take the form of verbal taunts or other abuse.

Q. What does the GPD think of the lawsuit mentioned in the previous post?
A. The GPD is opposed to frivolous lawsuits and cited the article only because it demonstrates the rampant nature of anti-pinkilessness, not because we think mothers should be sued.

Q. What is the GPD's official position on anti-pinkilessness?
A. The GPD is against discrimination in all of its forms and will use its influence to make sure that those who are guilty of anti-pinkilessness will not be welcome in civilized society.

Q. Isn't that discrimination against the anti-pinkiless?
A. The GPD does not engage in anti-anti-pinkilessness, nor is it guilty of discrimination. At the GNU Public Dictatorship we are nothing if not fair to all people, regardless of their gender, age, nationality, ethnic background, or pinky status. We do, however, reserve the right to outlaw destructive behaviors such as anti-pinkilessness, improper naming of babies, and so forth, subject to our indulgences policy which is still being finalized.

Q. Aren't their bigger issues that deserve your attention? What about the global economic troubles? What about North Korea?
A. There are bigger issues out there, but at the GPD we believe that the big issues are outgrowths of the little issues. If we solve the anti-pinkilessness problem, the North Koreans will likely abandon their nuclear ambitions, and the investors will have renewed confidence in the market.

Q. What happened to the outsourced FAQ?
A. Eliza was on vacation, so we did it ourselves this time.